Compromises work just as well. Golfers, who are sentimental about trees, ordinarily appreciate flower gardens and other formalized beds adorning the premises. Focus on such arrangements in conspicuous sections around the clubhouse. Thus, if you erect a shrub bed beside the parking lot, you will not appear as ecologically insensitive for logging a few menacing trees on the golf course.

Committees should always endeavor to reassure their members and limit their initial fears by transplanting trees at the beginning of a project. A preliminary presentation of tree care is essential. Relocating smaller trees into proper places on a golf course is a successful political tactic if implemented at the outset of the program.

Also, never divulge the actual number of trees designated for removal. Initially, two hundred trees sounds devastating and will likely send shock waves throughout the club. Most members do not realize that an average golf course contains between 20,000 and 30,000 trees. It is better not to explain. Instead, hedge significantly to the downside when disclosing the actual numbers.

Independent third party experts are often the most persuasive. Memberships tend to trust those who do not have a personal interest or agenda in club politics. Arborists and horticulturists are not qualified though, as proper evaluation would include more than an inventory of tree care. Rather, authorities should assess how trees interact with golf course strategy, aesthetics, agronomy, and safety. So hire an informed golf course architect with tree management experience.

Prosperous tree management programs often depend upon the ability of club officials to evade the wrath of emotionally attached members. Success is also determined by their ability to negotiate, educate, and win consensus. Different clubs may require different approaches. Evaluate which posture is most appropriate at your club, and initiate this long overdue process.